Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children -v- Gard [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam) was previously noted, when  only a press summary was available pending publication of the judgment. The reasons for judgment are now available.

The matter was an  inherent (protective) jurisdiction decision which concerned the withdrawal of ventilation (as sought by the clinicians) or the provision of innovative nucleoside therapy in the USA (as sought by the parents)  for an 8 month old child, Charlie Gard.

One thought on “‘Gard’ decision: Reasons for judgment

Comments are closed.